Book Review: d'artiste Matte Painting
Matte Painting is the third book in the d'artiste Digital Artists Master Class series. The series is actually a look at the process of creating art in tutorial style. This book presents Alp Altiner, Dylan Cole and Chris Stoski.
Each artist has a biography written by themselves on their beginnings, education, inspiration, life and career in art. The tutorials that follow are very well captioned. They explain the style, idea and the execution. Each comes with a still from the work in progress. There are lessons on using photo reference for compositing and texturing, fixing perspective and other useful tips.
Right after the tutorials is an invited artist gallery. That's where the 4 artist choose some of their favourite paintings from other artists and talk about them. This gallery is impressive. Let's just say talent shortage in the art industry is not a big problem.
This book is fairly pricey, as with all Ballistic books. I think it's pretty worth the money, considering that finding tutorials like this on the Internet is nearly impossible.
d'artiste Matte Painting: Digital Artists Master Class is available at Amazon (US | CA | UK | DE | FR | IT | ES | JP | CN)
Visit Amazon to check out more reviews.
If you buy from the links, I get a little commission that helps me get more books to feature.
Here are direct links to the book:
Amazon.com | Amazon.ca | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Amazon.fr | Amazon.it | Amazon.es | Amazon.co.jp | Amazon.cn
Comments
Hey man, thanks for the shout
Hey man, thanks for the shout out ;)
This is a great site too, i can see I'm going to be spending a lot of time here...
I have some other ballistic
I have some other ballistic books and I love them. Great quality. I'm thinking of buying these too.
Thanks for the great insight
Hello, I think this is the
Hello, I think this is the second (not third) book of the three book series. The first is digital painting, this is the second, the third being concept art. Yup =)
Opps, I am sorry, i think i
In reply to Hello, I think this is the by Bryan (not verified)
Opps, I am sorry, i think i got confused myself. May I know what's the proper sequence? Sorry!
Add new comment